Page 58 - A&A Patents&Design Rewind-2016
P. 58

4256-CHENP-2008        A process for the conversion of   Claims 1 & 2 were held not patentable under Section 3 (c) of the
574-CHENP-2008         18:2Δ9.12 (linoleic acid) to      Act, because the claim attempts to claim a sequence containing
4718-CHENP-2007        20:2Δ11,14”.                      a nucleic acid which is isolated. These claims were deleted to
                                                         obtain grant.
5027-CHENP-2009
                       A nucleic acid construct          In the absence of any clarity over the essential and
                       comprising a polynucleotide       constructional technical features of the claimed nucleic acid
                       comprising a nucleotide sequence  construct, it can be said that the claim is indefinite, vague and
                       encoding a polypeptide having     does not define the claimed subject matter technically. Since, the
                       beta-glucosidase activity,        structure of the nucleic acid construct claimed in claim 1 is not
                       wherein the polynucleotide is     clear it is not possible to carry out a precise prior art search.
                       operably linked to one or more    Hence, the novelty/inventive step of amended claim 1 and the
                       heterologous control sequences.   patentability of the claims u/s 3(c) cannot be acknowledged.

                       Anti-CD38 antibody.               The Controller held that performing an artificial or non-natural
                                                         process for generation of a naturally existing molecule does not
                                                         prove that the product claimed is out of ‘discovery’ and hence
                                                         does not escape the clutches of section 3(c) of the Patents Act,
                                                         1970.

                       Anti-idiotype antibodies.         It is clear that the claimed (in claims 1 to 24) SEQ ID NOs. 11,
                                                         13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19 and 20 refer to DNA and protein (PRT)
                                                         from Homo sapiens as stated in the SEQUENCE LISTINGS. It
                                                         amply proves the fact that the antibody and DNA claimed in
                                                         claims 1 to 25 are only the naturally occurring molecules.

                                                         The Applicant has not established production of antiidiotype
                                                         antibodies without the intervention of living system in a natural
                                                         way. Therefore, human intervention cannot be acknowledged for
                                                         the claimed anti-idiotype monoclonal antibodies. Hence, claims
                                                         1-6 are not allowed under Section 3(c).

58 | Patents & Design
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63