Page 37 - A&A Patents&Design Rewind-2016
P. 37

grant (8-10 years). Thus 50% of the          phones imported by Lava into India and using the
             patent term has terminated by the            technology of the suit patents.
             time the patent is granted. Further, 4-5
             years lapse in negotiations leaving only     The order, further directed the Defendant to deposit
             5 years of patent protection. In such        a sum of Rs.50 crores with the Registrar General of
             a case, especially for SEPs that have        the Court by way of FDR as security amount on
             been registered globally and have been       or before 20th June 2016. In addition to that, the
             licensed in over hundred agreements,         Defendant was also asked to file the statement of
             immediate enforcement of patent rights       accounts for the period of 2011 to 31st May 2016
             has to be encouraged.                        before the Court by 10th July 2016 and continue
       b.	 The Court also held that the Plaintiff has     to file the same quarterly till the final judgment is
             been trying to correspond and negotiate      delivered in the main suit. The order was to come
             with the Defendant for the past four         into effect from 21st June 2016.
             years and that itself is a huge factor that
             militates any grant of further time to the   The Court ruled that Ericsson was undisputedly the
             Defendant, especially in cases of SEPs,      owner of the suit patents and had taken execution of
             where a Patentee always endeavours to        a FRAND license agreement citing various reasons
             negotiate before filing for an injunction.   including raising objections regarding Ericsson’s
       c.	 Moreover, it was held that the fact that       relationship with Qualcomm. The Court noted
             the Defendant was aware of the Plaintiff’s   wilful delay on part of Lava to conclude the license
             patents but did not challenge the validity   agreement on FRAND terms. Moreover, in stark
             goes in favour of grant of an injunction.    contrast to the allegation put on Ericsson, the Court
                                                          held that Lava in fact had a dominant position in the
The Court passed an interim injunction order              Indian Market.
prohibiting Lava from importing, exporting,
manufacturing, offering for sale or selling any           The order can be accessed at:
mobile phones that use Ericsson’s eight SEPs. The         http://lobis.nic.in/ddir/dhc/MAN/
Defendant was also barred from exporting the              judgement/13-06-2016/MAN10062016IA57682015.
impugned goods. The Custom Authorities were               pdf
directed to not release consignments of mobile

                                                          Patents & Design | 37
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42