Page 46 - A&A Patents&Design Rewind-2016
P. 46
or in any way ascribing any bio-similarity with with the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and Rules
that of the plaintiff’s products HERCEPTIN, and the Guidelines on Biosimilars and in light
HERCLON, BICELTIS in any press releases, of the Court’s order. In the alternative, Biocon
public announcements, promotional or other in can await the final decision in this matter from
printed form and from relying upon or referring the High Court.
the Plaintiff’s names.
As per the Court, this interim measure is made
b) The Defendants may also manufacture and only in view of the peculiar facts of the present case
market the drug by qualifying the INN name wherein the Defendant is already in possession of
Trastuzumab as Biocon’s Trastuzumab or approvals granted rightly or wrongly, validity of
Mylan’s Trastuzumab wherever applicable to which is questioned in this suit.
describe the composition of molecule on the
product as well as in its insert and not in a An appeal was subsequently filed against the order
prominent manner. The said expression shall of the Single Judge. The Division Bench issued notice
be used at the bottom part of the carton and and stayed the order of the Single Judge.
should be in smaller sized letters than their
respective brand names. However, the INN The Division Bench of the Delhi High Court, has
name cannot stand alone on the carton or now reversed the order of the Single Judge and has
package and cannot be used as a brand name. permitted Biocon and Mylan to use Roche’s product
data for Trastuzumab.
c) In view of the prima facie findings of misleading
use of innovator data by Biocon and Mylan in The orders of the Single Judge and the Division
the product insert without undertaking all the Bench can be accessed here:
required clinical trials, Biocon and Mylan were http://lobis.nic.in/ddir/dhc/MAN/
also restrained from using the data relating judgement/26-04-2016/MAN25042016S3552014.
to manufacturing process, safety, efficacy and pdf
tests conducted for the safety of the drugs till http://delhihighcourt.nic.in/dhcqrydisp_o.
the time the final decision on the issue of bio asp?pn=93307&yr=2016
similarity is issued.
d) If Biocon intends to claim biosimilarity they can
make an application in this regard to DCGI who
should then evaluate the case in accordance
46 | Patents & Design

