Page 46 - A&A Patents&Design Rewind-2016
P. 46

or in any way ascribing any bio-similarity with        with the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and Rules
     that of the plaintiff’s products HERCEPTIN,            and the Guidelines on Biosimilars and in light
     HERCLON, BICELTIS in any press releases,               of the Court’s order. In the alternative, Biocon
     public announcements, promotional or other in          can await the final decision in this matter from
     printed form and from relying upon or referring        the High Court.
     the Plaintiff’s names.
                                                       As per the Court, this interim measure is made
b) The Defendants may also manufacture and             only in view of the peculiar facts of the present case
     market the drug by qualifying the INN name        wherein the Defendant is already in possession of
     Trastuzumab as Biocon’s Trastuzumab or            approvals granted rightly or wrongly, validity of
     Mylan’s Trastuzumab wherever applicable to        which is questioned in this suit.
     describe the composition of molecule on the
     product as well as in its insert and not in a     An appeal was subsequently filed against the order
     prominent manner. The said expression shall       of the Single Judge. The Division Bench issued notice
     be used at the bottom part of the carton and      and stayed the order of the Single Judge.
     should be in smaller sized letters than their
     respective brand names. However, the INN          The Division Bench of the Delhi High Court, has
     name cannot stand alone on the carton or          now reversed the order of the Single Judge and has
     package and cannot be used as a brand name.       permitted Biocon and Mylan to use Roche’s product
                                                       data for Trastuzumab.
c) In view of the prima facie findings of misleading
     use of innovator data by Biocon and Mylan in      The orders of the Single Judge and the Division
     the product insert without undertaking all the    Bench can be accessed here:
     required clinical trials, Biocon and Mylan were   http://lobis.nic.in/ddir/dhc/MAN/
     also restrained from using the data relating      judgement/26-04-2016/MAN25042016S3552014.
     to manufacturing process, safety, efficacy and    pdf
     tests conducted for the safety of the drugs till  http://delhihighcourt.nic.in/dhcqrydisp_o.
     the time the final decision on the issue of bio   asp?pn=93307&yr=2016
     similarity is issued.

d) If Biocon intends to claim biosimilarity they can
     make an application in this regard to DCGI who
     should then evaluate the case in accordance

46 | Patents & Design
   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51